At MyHR, we’re frequently asked this question, and it’s clear there’s often confusion about the differences between independent contractors and employees in Canada.
Employees and contractors each offer unique advantages and disadvantages to employers. For example, you may want to manage uncertainty by avoiding long-term commitments to employees or have a need for skilled contractors for a specific project. In both of these scenarios, hiring an independent contractor would be advantageous.
Alternatively, you might want the stability of having an ongoing commitment from employees, or wish to avoid higher contractor rates by handling work in-house.
Similarly, individuals might prefer contracting for its flexibility or perceived tax benefits, or they may agree to a contracting relationship to secure work, even stating they’re “okay with waiving employment rights.”
However, it’s not simply up to the worker or the employer to decide. In Canada, the actual nature of the working relationship determines whether someone is an employee or an independent contractor. Getting this wrong can expose your business to significant legal and financial risks under both employment standards and tax laws.
Recent rulings in Canadian courts demonstrate the risks of misclassifying workers. For instance, cases have resulted in businesses being required to pay back wages, unpaid vacation pay, or other entitlements when contractors were later deemed employees. Misclassification can also lead to penalties from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), such as assessments for unpaid CPP contributions, EI premiums, and tax withholdings.
Understanding the difference between employees and contractors is essential. Here's a practical guide to help minimise risks to your business.
Employees often fill key roles within an organisation, especially those requiring ongoing commitment and loyalty.
It’s less common for contractors to fill senior or long-term roles in an organization. They are typically engaged for specific projects or highly specialized tasks.
There are several practical tests you can use to assess the true nature of a working relationship.
1. Control and independence
Q: Does the individual decide how and when to complete the work, or does the employer set these terms?
A: If the employer exercises significant control over the worker, they are more likely an employee.
2. Termination
Q: Can the working relationship end abruptly without formal notice or process?
A: If the worker expects ongoing work and would feel aggrieved if dismissed without notice, they are more likely an employee.
3. Leave
Q: Does the individual determine their own time off, or must they request and receive approval?
A: If time off must be approved, this indicates an employment relationship.
4. Financial risk and tools
Q: Does the worker invest in their tools and equipment, or does the employer provide them?
A: Contractors bear financial risk and are responsible for their operating expenses, whereas employees typically do not.
Misclassifying workers can lead to significant penalties under both employment and tax laws. Employers may be required to retroactively pay: